<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dmoz, Yahoo Directory and BOTW &#8211; Are Directories important for SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/</link>
	<description>Australia Online Marketing and Strategy, SEO, SEM, CPC and insider secrets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:39:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Becky Wombell</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Wombell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>I struggled to get in DMOZ and was expecting great things when I finally managed it, but I can&#039;t really think there&#039;s been any benefit. 

Will try the Yahoo Directory and BOTW though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggled to get in DMOZ and was expecting great things when I finally managed it, but I can&#8217;t really think there&#8217;s been any benefit. </p>
<p>Will try the Yahoo Directory and BOTW though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucio Dias Ribeiro</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5712</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucio Dias Ribeiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5712</guid>
		<description>There you go,
Seriously there are more important things than DMOZ
Too much for nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go,<br />
Seriously there are more important things than DMOZ<br />
Too much for nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Colt</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5710</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Colt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5710</guid>
		<description>I agree to lucio I submitted a site on DMOZ and I still wait for a long time but my site still not included. I don&#039;t see any problems with that submission and a lot of SEO said that it is really hard to list on DMOZ  while yahoo directories is more important and valuable even though it is paid I get a lot of backlinks on yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to lucio I submitted a site on DMOZ and I still wait for a long time but my site still not included. I don&#8217;t see any problems with that submission and a lot of SEO said that it is really hard to list on DMOZ  while yahoo directories is more important and valuable even though it is paid I get a lot of backlinks on yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Heaton</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>Lucio ... I like the way you explain that certain keywords are useful at different points in the sales cycle. This sort of thinking helps us understand how we may want to structure our keywords across the site as a way of accelerating a sales funnel.
.-= Gavin Heaton&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ServantOfChaos/~3/4xOelj8MrP8/last-minute-call-to-men.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Last Minute Call to Men&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucio &#8230; I like the way you explain that certain keywords are useful at different points in the sales cycle. This sort of thinking helps us understand how we may want to structure our keywords across the site as a way of accelerating a sales funnel.<br />
.-= Gavin Heaton&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ServantOfChaos/~3/4xOelj8MrP8/last-minute-call-to-men.html" rel="nofollow">Last Minute Call to Men</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucio ribeiro</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5333</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucio ribeiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5333</guid>
		<description>Seth, Yes, screw you DMOZ was more like - I won&#039;t bother to kill myself or my clients to get them listed there. 
Yes, it&#039;s good sense still to try to list it there however it&#039;s not the biggest thing ever, there are other places you can get listed, generate credibility and have the same (if not) even more effect than get listed on DMOZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, Yes, screw you DMOZ was more like &#8211; I won&#8217;t bother to kill myself or my clients to get them listed there.<br />
Yes, it&#8217;s good sense still to try to list it there however it&#8217;s not the biggest thing ever, there are other places you can get listed, generate credibility and have the same (if not) even more effect than get listed on DMOZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Rietdijk</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5330</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Rietdijk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5330</guid>
		<description>Very good article though I would not say &quot;screw DMOZ&quot;. It is always wise to try and get a submission in and it will not take that long either. If they index you then it is always a plus above the websites that are not listed.

BOTW and Yahoo are absolutely directories you should get listed in since not only serps but also users seem to value these directories. It makes your website/business much more trustworthy as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article though I would not say &#8220;screw DMOZ&#8221;. It is always wise to try and get a submission in and it will not take that long either. If they index you then it is always a plus above the websites that are not listed.</p>
<p>BOTW and Yahoo are absolutely directories you should get listed in since not only serps but also users seem to value these directories. It makes your website/business much more trustworthy as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo melbourne</title>
		<link>http://marketingeasy.net/dmoz-yahoo-directory-botw-directories-important-seo/2009-06-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>seo melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingeasy.net/?p=748#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>Hi David , we are seo company based in Melbourne, for some of our customers we have achieved top positions in Google  without Dmoz, Yahoo Directory and BOTW.  However it may speed up the seo process</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David , we are seo company based in Melbourne, for some of our customers we have achieved top positions in Google  without Dmoz, Yahoo Directory and BOTW.  However it may speed up the seo process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
